Let those without irony

read without whining.

Let those without hyperbole...

Tapper Guiliani

This childishness seems the inverse of logic.
Let those without sin cast the first stone?
How many points are in this bag of stones.

Assuming a stone is for throwing, and there is an unnamed target, it is the who and the order that might be significant.
without /first
10/10/16

Pardon my lack of follow-up.

Finally Two!

What's all the hullabaloo?

[C-legend need to update.]
A legend is a map of sorts, to a map.
Example:  NFR = not fully read
[!] = (sic) read as intended, pun, irony, sarcasm NFB, not fully blue[!]
or tangents

Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

Green Walled Parallel

Not exactly the lesson. 

The LA Times piece was much more fair and balanced* than The Intercept "editorial".  Snowden was not the author of the legislation, congress was.  Glenn Greenwald's journalism(or logic) on this matter might lead me to give the Republican Party credit for the recovery**. 

*I've decapitalized and un-quotation marked for sake of irony
[Rumsfeld/Korb All In for American Progress]
** if it wasn't the LA Times that made the claim on authorship

Obtuse Hardball

Is Chris Matthews being provocatively obtuse or is he being naively journalistic as the Devil's Advocate?

Rand  Paul?

Irony  ! [<-one insert 5-10-15 ... ]
context principle  [- ! -] dot dot dot?

retro face ~ PC [^] ?

M-bed Google?

For Careful Processing:

Iran Progress?
Israelis' Onion?
GOP Treason?

The Middle East label has been underused in this blog.  Foreign Policy a more frequent label.  Not sure if the Obama Doctrine has superseded it.  The piece by Juan Cole may seem in jest, but may be the actual reason Israel is so belligerent.  Not to mention the GOP. 

4-7-15 link @ mention added

Daryl Cagle ?

not too mention ? Irony Table?
???   Daryl  Cagle !!!

4-8-15
Foreign and Domestic?

Fed~Upism?

Knit One?
(a. FP4 (2-20-15) FP$, b.Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One), c. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, d. Shilling / Schiller, e. Try Angle Nation )
Pear Type-Oh? Re:nacre
(a. Knit one , b. or ?, c. Going through Hegel or..., d. Crooked Timber, e. 'n?, f. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, g. Remember Pearl Harbor! )

Ctlr F: type-O.(...) [!]
Irony within Onion ? [!]
Misplaced support ? (...)
(a. QCON and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT, b. Under the Table?, c.The day of the Elephant?, d. Leveling the World Stage?, e. For Careful Processing:, f. There was the 3 AM call..., g. And Bailout..., h. GOLEFT TV  ...?)

(un-Mbedded consequences? 4Lab-L's)

4-14-15
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .

A Budding Teflon Plant!

Is that what Indiana is known for ?

The interview ?

Ba*ZingGoP ! ?

* caption added

[Or irony of whosure state ?]

Knitty Gritty

Schell Lacking ?*

*:  Who shells, C sells, at the she soar [?]

[Not to un-mbed!]
(oar) a. Divide to conquer?, b., c. The Read C?, d. Knitty Gritty , e. Ghosh Darn , f. Not that I am fixed... , g. The Fourth Dimention of Twain , h. Reigning Wags and Tales. , i. Lemon Ship , j. Dark Matter, Anti-Matter ,  k. Fn 4 point Oh June 2013! , l., m. See Pact, n.(b~ch), o. Footnote: interesting digs, p.Etch-A-Sketch 2.0 , q. Alter Under Construction
(ofor): A. Irony versus Hypocrisy, B. Weak End Update: Fun'n Edifying, C. Anticipation Project ^ , D.TGIF (two) , E. Lean Forward File , F. The Way Fourth?, G. Coin-age of the day. , H. GRN , I. Post-Pyth , J., K. "Feel the Love"? , L. The %th EleFont , M. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , N. Throwing the Game , O. N-oddly Enough... ,  P. Ideology , Q. The Bully... , R. Unprincipled ,  S. Vast Mainstream Conspiracy (VMC) , T. Realmiffication , U. HEAR HEAR! V. ENTERNEWSMEANT TODAY (and tomorrow) W. Forward (Ironically) ...

Tan Gents?
Lab L's?
A., B. Amidst the Pile and Piling On., C., d. Leaking Diplomacy, e. Executing (the) Constitution, f.Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**, g.Plausible Disciplination[?],  h. i.Questions on Vetting?, j. Hiding Behind the Straw Argument.
We 3 Kings? O W ?

Files of the

Third Kind? 
Snowden
War'ren
This pentagonal* file was unintentional but did not just happen.  There was an order in the linking, not that they were the order of the words.*  Inserted this order. 3, 4~5(1, 2) where the ellipsed were from an earlier browse of my in-box, and the last line was furc'8ed by choice.  Not to avoid any CH,  Buffeting, or labelism.  Not to mention, but I guess I am, a lost(~)reference from a counter(~) perspective, speaking of W)~(B . 

(~) not sure which ~)(~
Hint: Monty Python, Life of Brian

*3-6-15  Way off the Mark, but maybe to avoid the X-files, that's not the ticket.  And certainly not Platonic**. The P or point is or maybe the pythagornomics***. 

** OW ~ The irony of p[!] Or is it Pi?  AnyHow, a`tension may have been implied. (3/4)~**

*** coined Word? (P)~(F) ?[!](~) (F`P`?)

 

[Need caption/credit(...)]

Hume or Hegel

(~)^?

Egg-Road-Sky ?



Flat Kind ? 

(~) ?: alt image to be f(R)OWnd

 

 

 

War Powers Conjugation!

Joint Resolution
Authorization for Use of Military Force
Manichean Reconstitution.
Letter to Congress

If we don't get buy in, we may get sell out. 
The fulcrum of* debait and irony woods, or Tiger Irons. 

[The Last Word: Phyllis Bennis/ Patrick Murphy]*
*type-O alert

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2-13-15 [Public Support]
Rules of Engagement
New War Powers* Act ?

 

Esoteric Relemma[!]

Waltzing with (Leo)Strauss:**  ~(o.p. 2-17-15)
Relemma Revisited
Not exactly.*

* No Teddy

(FP!)

** 2-18-15 Not to pun on Peter, Paul or Pan Rand, but this^^ is a few degrees into(1) acadamia(2). 

(1)^ A. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) , B. Give 'em a break!
(2)  Clash of Civilizations (m-bed'ed in A.) 
^ links flip-flopped, re:scroll over alph-click
Speaking of read: Rat Races Van Mices?   I am a bit discontent with my reading of Democracy's Discontent. 
^^ NFRY That's the ticket [!] Three paragraphs in I need to reboot or check the irony.

[...] not the flack but (~)the flock.(*) (:~:) ?
(*)- need to delineate flack 'n flock

Parsing Systems

P.S.  Are we Charlie?  Or why aren't we French? 
It is a shame that fame comes under such horrible circumstances.

Not to bury the lede in nuance or labels, but I intend to more heavily edit** insertion of links for the time being.  Unfortunately I may have now buried more nonsense*.  I am not Forbes, The Atlantic or Slate.  Not that I have placed then in any order of sense.  My point was to review any prior use elsewhere that I have yet to place in context~. 

*not that I have parsed the nonsense, be it the Daily Caller, the New York Times, David Brooks or any of their words.

** carefully filter

*~* I am not a Paper Bird! 
Je ne pax The String! 
Nor Car Tunist. 
R we all sat-irists?

RFD? ?[?]  Not to withdraw weapons.



1-13-15 The vig ? ** not fully read IRONY!

I am not Forbes ~!~  Context:  This is a difficult read.  Is it really necessary to disseminate examples to determine that the killings are not justified? Maybe we are more French than we might like[!]  Further context:  Images and cartoons in reaction to the massacre are not comparable to the images or cartoons that Charlie Hebdo publishes.  Not that I have avoided either, I just wished to review my m-beds.  i.e. links I have yet to parse or deconstruct
 
(Now, Romney? The Reid Report, pre-The Cycle. Un-parsed: -)

Perspectivism

A preemptive thought intruded before I could go further. Where are the women?  I will leave that for another time.
So it is with only slight further ado, that I note the heading, as the only context for the mentioning** of a few blogs. 

Contrary Brin
Pax On Both Houses

From Gender to Genre:
Darwins-god
A forth perspective.*

The first two especially, respect style and perspectivism, not to mention** subject matter. 
The third is a stretch on a few counts*, let alone complexity. A runner-up for 4th might be:

*still in processing

1-6-15
[Pardon the spacing anomalies.]
Re:runner-ups. 
^*^ 3rd and 4th anachronism.** Counter-popperism? 
** asteri(s)cal anachronism ^context~mentioning^
(s) type-O?/ asterical(spell check in-operable[!]?)
[R.I.P. Not a shot at irony[!], police labor strife*** works where justice fails?
*** not a strike @ hard work, they do. [!](?) 

WTF!

What the fork!
Or why the fractal?
Buy chiminy[!]*
*




The Domino is the ...irony? analog?^
Or Bane or?















[Route of the dilemma? Parsin'or conjugation[!] ]
or reassemble that remark.




[...  ever wonder about a word like pre-emption? (Hyphenated's or not?)
... And then wonder how post-emption might work? ]
  
Root, route, rout?


Seg-way to... the google of post~emption. 


(FP!) (1)buy, (2) A, B, C(c), D(d). (3)A, B, C, D~/~G'Ribble, E /The Irony of the Message, F F'n P[!], G, H(h). (4)Ctrl F Cricket? (5) or Forensics Matter.
6^ : ana-logue? Knot the point[!].

Read or Ship?

Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]


Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!]   You got Ed!


Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?


Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization?  AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
　Post-Ship or Precalculus of WOT?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:  
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .  

Satire is not a two way street.

That is the proposal.  That it is unlikely to be possible for there to be equivalence on the right and left.  Now that is an awkward statement or phrasing of the* obvious. 

There is difficulty comparing anything at opposite ends of the political spectrum, let alone** middles.  The Olbermann/Beck comparison is along the lines of journalism more than parody.  Limbaugh along the lines of Colbert more than Olbermann.  It may be along the lines of who is pulling whose leg for whom.  That's the gravitas!

To paraphrase the difficulty for which there is more work needed, parody may be more difficult for those in power. But this may confuse parody with satire, or either with having a point, confounded by the(~)irony of being direct about the point in a world of hypocrisy.

(FP1)
(awkward): A. "Comedian Rush Limbaugh", B. Whatcha gonna do about it?  

*12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. ..., c. ..., d. ..., e. ... ,  f. ... ,  g. ...   h. BtU  , I. What the Beck? , j. ... , k., (l.)  ..., (m.) ... (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...(FP!)
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.  
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day?, B.  The New Compendium, C. Primary Boogeyman, D. Not to make light..., (...)  R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? ... (...)

(FP!) It is important to note that I have barely finished processing much of what I have included above @ ** in particular.


PaxOnBothHouses

Add caption

*** not inserted but re~spectrum 'tween *&**.

WOB-L-E

War on blood[!]


[!] = emphasis sarcasm/irony/rhetorical


BOP ~ blood on policy!We got it!
That's the ticket[!]


(FP1):to file A., B., C., D., E. 
AM/RFD-MSNBC
(fp2): to file A. Attention Fine Print Readers!, B., C.
(fb3): In regards to lede or ship... A. Running Joke , B. We got it!


Two NYPD officers were gunned down in their own squad cars on Saturday afternoon. Words are far from sufficient to express the horror and tragedy that such an event represents.  My above nuance is only a beginning.  It is unfortunate that it seems to have become an instant blame game.  It seems that if freedom of speech is not protected only criminals will be using it. 

INET

Joseph Stiglitz: Economics Has to Come to Terms with Wealth and Income Inequality
Xavier Gabaix: NFRY / PC

While reading the first I imagined a curve representing a tipping point and it's margins.  I also considered that dominoes can tip either way, but that is not the game called Dominoes. Then I properly applied the Laffer Curve but thought of a gulch of sorts.  (Ctrl F. Newtonian: not to mention 3-body problems.)  See PC and NFRY.  THE POINT ? [!] (Poe Pen dull  em?)

12-20-14
The mess ~ age is the message.  Not knot (~) exactly [!]
Fail fast/Bohemian Gravity/Enantiodromia=2#/8th. (Bohemian Irony Dimensions ... ?)